This section is the exam's post-mortem. Every OSCE produces data that shows how well it worked. The data shows how consistent the scores were and which stations discriminated. It shows which examiners drifted. It shows whether the pass mark sat where the committee thought it did. Schools that read this data improve every year. Schools that file it repeat the same faults.
The section starts with reliability. It explains what the coefficient means for an OSCE and what values the literature accepts. It explains why a reliable exam needs enough stations and enough testing time first. No amount of examiner training can make up for too few stations. It covers the metrics that describe a single station. It gives the thresholds that mark a station as weak.
It then covers the people effects. How do you compare examiners? How do you spot a circuit or a session that scored differently from the others? What should you do about the difference before results are released?
The section closes with the review cycle. What should the committee see after each exam? What should change before the next one? Which stations stay in the bank, and which retire? It also covers the audit trail that an accreditation visit will request.
The psychometrician, the assessment lead, and the quality office own this section. The pages explain the methods in full. A school can run them in a spreadsheet or in software and read the output either way.